Mabble Rabble
random ramblings & thunderous tidbits
29 March 2025
Water from Thin Air
Why Adsense is so Bad
28 March 2025
ShadowDragon's SocialNet
Knowledge Graphs and LLMs
Digital Nomadism
27 March 2025
Chinese Social Media
RAG and Legal Documents
The legal field is notorious for its complexity, with vast amounts of information scattered across statutes, case law, and legal commentaries. Navigating this maze can be a daunting task for even the most seasoned lawyers. However, the Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Large Language Models (LLMs) offers a promising solution to streamline legal research and analysis.
RAG leverages the power of LLMs by combining them with external knowledge sources.
This approach offers several advantages. Firstly, RAG enables LLMs to access and process the most up-to-date information directly from the source. This ensures that the answers provided are accurate and compliant with the latest legal developments. Secondly, by grounding the LLM's responses in specific legal documents, it enhances transparency and accountability. Users can easily verify the LLM's reasoning by referring to the cited passages.
Furthermore, RAG can significantly improve the efficiency of legal research and analysis.
However, implementing RAG for legal research also presents certain challenges. Ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the knowledge base is crucial. The legal landscape is constantly evolving, requiring frequent maintenance and updates to the underlying data. Additionally, addressing potential biases in the data and ensuring fairness and ethical considerations in the LLM's responses are important considerations.
Despite the challenges, the potential benefits of using RAG and LLMs to navigate legal cases and guidebooks are huge. By leveraging the power of AI and machine learning, lawyers can enhance their understanding of complex legal issues, improve the quality of their legal advice, and ultimately provide better service to their clients.
FCA Handbook with RAG
Google Customer Service
Tacred for Relation Extraction
26 March 2025
Great Retail Deception
25 March 2025
24 March 2025
Third-Party Licensing Services
- LicenseSpring
- 10Duke
- Cryptolens
- PACE
- Wibu
- Keygen
- LicenseOne
- SoftwareKey
- QuickLicense
- ProtectionMaster
- SafetNet Sentinel
- Trelica
- OpenLM
- Software Shield
- Zluri
- Flexera
- Ivanti
- Snow
- AssetSonar
- Reprise
- Torii
- AWS license manager
- ServiceNow
Midjourney Full Editor
AI, MR, and Sports
23 March 2025
Chart-Topping Hits and AI
AI and Luxury Travel
Future of Smartphones
AI and Virtual Concerts
AI and Virtual Shopping Malls
AI and Virtual Home Shopping
GNN for Humor Generation
Top Summarization Datasets
- CNN/DailyMail
- XSum
- PubMed
- Arxiv
- MultiNews
- BigPatent
- TL;DR
- NewsSum
- DUC
- Samsum
- WikiHow
- BillSum
- MediaSum
- QMSum
- RedditTIFU
- DialogSum
- Hyperpartisan News Summarization (HANS)
- Scientific Papers with Figures (SciFig)
- The Webis TL;DR
- QMSum 2
- CodeSearchNet
- TREC Datasets (Various)
- NYT Annotated Corpus
- SCITLDR
- WikiSummary
GNN for Story Generation
22 March 2025
Don't Be Fooled by AI and Humans
Why Critically Evaluate:
- Bias in Data and Algorithms
- Biased data leads to biased models and algorithms
- Black Box Problem
- Opaque internal workings makes it difficult to understand why a model produces an output, reducing trust and accountability
- Overfitting and Lack of Generalization
- Limits on model performance in generalizability and overfitting to training data
- Publication Bias
- Overestimation on methods as papers publish overaly positive results
- Speed of the Field
- Not enough vetting on research papers to keep up the pace with field
- Check Authors and Affiliations
- Assess authors reputation
- Examine Data and Methodology
- Evaluate the quality of data and rigor of experimental research
- Look for reproducibility
- Can it be reproduced through code or data?
- Consider Limitations
- Do the authors critically evaluate their on results and limitations, are the results sound and sensible?
- Seek Peer Review
- Look for reputable peer-reviewed sources, even peer review is not a guarantee
- Cross-Reference and Compare
- Compare findings with other related research, find consensus or conflicting results
- Be Aware of Funding Resources
- Who funded this research? Is there a conflict of interest?
Text-Driven Forecasting Papers
- Measuring Consistency in Text-based Financial Forecasting Models
- Multi-Modal Forecaster: Jointly Predicting Time Series and Textual Data
- Revolutionizing Finance with LLMs: An Overview of Applications and Insights
- Extract Information from Hybrid Long Documents Leveraging LLMs: A Framework and Dataset
- Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information